**Geneva, Switzerland –** A pivotal piece of evidence in the ongoing trial of Samuel Menkes, accused of the death of his wife, Sandra, has been released to the public: a complete audio recording of the couple’s argument immediately preceding her fatal fall from the Menkes family chalet. The recording, released late this afternoon by the Geneva Prosecutor’s Office, has immediately reignited debate and speculation surrounding the case, adding a chilling layer of detail to the already complex investigation.

The approximately 45-minute recording captures a heated exchange between Samuel and Sandra, recorded on the evening of November 19th, the day of her death. Initially, the conversation appears relatively mundane, centered on financial matters and a planned trip to Rome. However, as the recording progresses, the tone shifts dramatically. Sandra repeatedly accuses Samuel of infidelity and expresses deep unhappiness within their marriage. Samuel, in turn, becomes increasingly defensive and accusatory, questioning her mental state and suggesting she may be deliberately attempting to sabotage their lives.

“She was just… constantly pulling me apart,” Samuel is heard saying, his voice strained. “She wanted to destroy everything we built. I felt like I was fighting a losing battle.”

The recording continues with a crescendo of accusations and denials. Sandra vehemently denies infidelity and accuses Samuel of manipulating her, suggesting he may have known more about her planned fall than he’s let on. Witnesses present during the trial, including the chalet’s housekeeper, Marie Dubois, described the atmosphere in the courtroom following the playback. “It was… intense,” Dubois stated. “You could feel the weight of it all. Everyone was just… stunned. It was like the room went silent for a moment.”

Legal analysts suggest the recording’s release could significantly impact the prosecution’s case, which primarily rests on circumstantial evidence. Defense attorney Antoine Dubois has already indicated they intend to use the recording to paint a picture of a marriage riddled with dysfunction and potentially a volatile environment.

The trial is expected to resume tomorrow morning, with the focus now firmly on the recording and its implications. The coming days promise to be a crucial turning point in this unfolding, and increasingly unsettling, case.